lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:48:40 +0800
From:   Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/core: Adjusting the order of
 scanning CPU



On 2022/11/14 Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:43:00PM +0800, Hao Jia wrote:
>> When select_idle_capacity() starts scanning for an idle CPU, it starts
>> with target CPU that has already been checked in select_idle_sibling().
>> So we start checking from the next CPU and try the target CPU at the end.
>> Similarly for task_numa_assign(), we have just checked numa_migrate_on
>> of dst_cpu, so start from the next CPU. This also works for
>> steal_cookie_task(), the first scan must fail and start directly
>> from the next one.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com>
> 
> Test results in general look ok so
> 
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> 

Thanks for your review and feedback.

Thanks,
Hao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ