linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Allow syscon on qcom,msm8976-apcs-kpss-global

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:00:54 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        agross@...nel.org
Cc:     andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
        keescook@...omium.org, tony.luck@...el.com, gpiccoli@...lia.com,
        evgreen@...omium.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        a39.skl@...il.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, kernel@...labora.com, luca@...tu.xyz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Allow syscon on
 qcom,msm8976-apcs-kpss-global

Il 16/11/22 09:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 16/11/2022 09:52, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 15/11/22 17:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>>> On 11/11/2022 13:01, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>> MSM8976 supports SMSM, which needs this node to also be a syscon:
>>>> move the compatible to allow that.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: bcc8d70f912d ("dt-bindings: mailbox: Add compatible for the MSM8976")
>>>
>>> I am not sure if this is still a bug. Maybe just a missing feature?
>>>
>>
>> This changes how you use this mailbox across the entire devicetree (as other
>> nodes will not use mboxes = xxxx, but qcom,ipc = xxxx as syscon), so I think
>> that this is not a missing feature?
> 
> Whether it is a bug depends on existing usage. If none of msm8976 DTSes
> use it the other way, then it is just incomplete or missing support. Not
> a bug. If existing DTSes use it as syscon, thus you need to add syscon
> to compatible, then it would be a bugfix.
> 

It's not a bugfix then. The Fixes tag shall be dropped.

Same question like the other commit, should I send a v3 or can it be dropped while
applying?