lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221116095405.GA16833@hu-ppareek-blr.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:24:05 +0530
From:   Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@...cinc.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
        Shazad Hussain <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>,
        "Brian Masney" <bmasney@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: add SA8540P ride(Qdrive-3)

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 09:16:32AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:22:07PM +0530, Parikshit Pareek wrote:
> > Introduce the Qualcomm SA8540P ride automotive platform, also known as
> > Qdrive-3 development board.
> > 
> > This initial contribution supports SMP, CPUFreq, cluster idle, UFS, RPMh
> > regulators, debug UART, PMICs, remoteprocs and USB.
> > 
> > The SA8540P ride contains four PM8450 PMICs. A separate DTSI file has
> > been created for PMIC, so that it can be used for future SA8540P based
> > boards.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@...cinc.com>
> 
> > +&ufs_mem_hc {
> > +	reset-gpios = <&tlmm 228 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > +
> > +	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l17c>;
> > +	vcc-max-microamp = <800000>;
> > +	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l6c>;
> > +	vccq-max-microamp = <900000>;
> > +
> > +	status = "disabled";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&ufs_mem_phy {
> > +	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l8g>;
> > +	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l3g>;
> > +
> > +	status = "disabled";
> > +};
> 
> Why are these disabled? This should be mentioned somewhere (e.g. commit
> message and/or comment) or you can drop the nodes until support is in
> place.
My bad. Happened by mistake.
> 
> Johan
Regards,
Parikshit Pareek

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ