lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26a3508e4f57f6104abecd90192f12375fe04ecc.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 11:58:46 +0000
From:   "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
CC:     "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Shahar, Sagi" <sagis@...gle.com>,
        "Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
        "isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
        "dmatlack@...gle.com" <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 049/108] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Support TDX private mapping
 for TDP MMU


>  
> +static inline int kvm_alloc_private_spt_for_split(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	gfp &= ~__GFP_ZERO;
> +	sp->private_spt = (void *)__get_free_page(gfp);
> +	if (!sp->private_spt)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> 
[...]

> @@ -1238,6 +1408,12 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
>  		    is_large_pte(iter.old_spte)) {
>  			if (tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(vcpu->kvm, &iter))
>  				break;
> +			/*
> +			 * TODO: large page support.
> +			 * Doesn't support large page for TDX now
> +			 */
> +			KVM_BUG_ON(is_private_sptep(iter.sptep), vcpu->kvm);
> +
>  

So large page is not supported for private page, ...

>  			/*
>  			 * The iter must explicitly re-read the spte here
> @@ -1480,6 +1656,12 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp, union kvm_mm
>  
>  	sp->role = role;
>  	sp->spt = (void *)__get_free_page(gfp);
> +	if (kvm_mmu_page_role_is_private(role)) {
> +		if (kvm_alloc_private_spt_for_split(sp, gfp)) {
> +			free_page((unsigned long)sp->spt);
> +			sp->spt = NULL;
> +		}
> +	}

... then I don't think eager splitting could happen for private mapping?
 
If so, should we just KVM_BUG_ON() if role is private?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ