[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221117164612.65832e37@rotkaeppchen>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:46:12 +0100
From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ribalda@...gle.com,
zwisler@...gle.com, robdclark@...il.com,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kexec: Freeze processes before kexec
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:16:10 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 19:56:24 +0000
> "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > @@ -1175,6 +1175,12 @@ int kernel_kexec(void)
> > } else
> > #endif
> > {
> > + error = freeze_processes();
> > + if (error) {
> > + error = -EBUSY;
> > + goto Unlock;
> > + }
>
> If this is the path of a kernel panic, do we really want to check the
> return error of freeze_processes()? We are panicing, there's not much more
> we can do.
kernel_kexec isn't called during panic. We don't need to worry about it
here.
Having that said I think this is a problem in the device driver _not_
in kexec. In my opinion it's the job of the driver to prevent such
races during shutdown.
Thanks
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists