linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: drop redundant part of title of shared bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y3Z0w6JH1f5zgwvW@spud>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:52:03 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: drop redundant part of title of
 shared bindings

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:38:42PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Devicetree bindings document does not have to say in the title that
> it is a "binding", but instead just describe the hardware.  For shared
> (re-usable) schemas, name them all as "common properties".


> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
> index 1ab416c83c8d..d2de3d128b73 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml#
>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>  
> -title: Qualcomm Global Clock & Reset Controller Common Bindings
> +title: Qualcomm Global Clock & Reset Controller common parts
>  
>  maintainers:
>    - Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>


> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> index cf9c2f7bddc2..20ac432dc683 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml#
>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>  
> -title: Generic OPP (Operating Performance Points) Common Binding
> +title: Generic OPP (Operating Performance Points) common parts
>  
>  maintainers:
>    - Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Hey Krzysztof,

Hopefully I've not overlooked something obvious, but it wasnt noted in
the commit message - how come these two are "parts" rather than
"properties"? The opp one at least don't seem to have much more than
properties and patterProperties in it.

Thanks,
Conor.