lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW4GBD4uhPqDAubO=xF+ve6G-STtt8fxzFNvGcnWcfaSxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 12:00:03 -0800
From:   Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To:     "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Martin Liska <mliska@...e.cz>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/46] x86/livepatch, lto: Disable live patching with gcc LTO

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 3:48 AM Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
>
> It is not supported by gcc 12 so far, so it causes compiler "sorry"
> messages.
>
> Other than the compiler support, there shouldn't be any barriers for
> live patching LTOed kernels, although it might be more difficult to
> create patches for larger functions.

A loosely related question: does livepatch work with CLANG LTO?
AFAICT, kpatch-build doesn't support it. But the kernel side should
work just fine?

Thanks,
Song

[...]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ