lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:44:37 -0800
From:   "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, <markgross@...nel.org>
CC:     <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        <tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
        <athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@...el.com>, <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove memory allocation
 from load path



On 11/17/2022 1:13 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/17/22 20:59, Jithu Joseph wrote:
>> IFS requires tests to be authenticated once for each CPU socket
>> on a system.
>>
>> scan_chunks_sanity_check() was dynamically allocating memory
>> to store the state of whether tests have been authenticated on
>> each socket for every load operation.
>>
>> Move the memory allocation to init path and store the pointer
>> in ifs_data struct.
>>
>> Also rearrange the adjacent error checking in init for a
>> more simplified and natural flow.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
>> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
>> ---
>>  - Replaced global pkg_auth pointer to struct ifs_data (Hans)
>>  - Rearrange the adjacent error checking flow in ifs_init (Hans)
>>  - With this change there are conflicts in patches 11 and 12 (I will
>>     post the updated 11 and 12 if this is satisfactory)
> 
> Thanks, this patch looks good to me now:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> 

Thanks for the detailed review and suggestions.
I will now resend patches 11 and 12 which will apply ontop of this revised patch4 . 

Jithu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ