[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221117000330.up7qwxjnrtb3u2ll@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 03:03:30 +0300
From: "kirill@...temov.name" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: "'Kirill A. Shutemov'" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lkp@...el.com" <lkp@...el.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: Fix get_user() in call sg_scsi_ioctl()
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:40:09PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Kirill A. Shutemov
> > Sent: 16 November 2022 00:44
> >
> > get_user() expects the pointer to be pointer-to-simple-variable type,
> > but sic->data is array of 'unsigned char'. It violates get_user()
> > contracts.
> >
> > Cast it explicitly to 'unsigned char __user *'. It matches current
> > behaviour.
> >
> > This is preparation for fixing sparse warnings caused by Linear Address
> > Masking patchset.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
> > index 2d20da55fb64..72b3ab5137b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
> > @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static int sg_scsi_ioctl(struct request_queue *q, fmode_t mode,
> > return -EFAULT;
> > if (in_len > PAGE_SIZE || out_len > PAGE_SIZE)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - if (get_user(opcode, sic->data))
> > + if (get_user(opcode, (unsigned char __user *)sic->data))
>
> Using &sic->data[0] should work and is much nicer than the cast.
Okay. Fair enough. Adjusted patch is below.
>From 86baed963c9295c067940479ab0f844c3644e1c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 03:22:28 +0300
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/2] scsi: Fix get_user() in call sg_scsi_ioctl()
get_user() expects the pointer to be pointer-to-simple-variable type,
but sic->data is array of 'unsigned char'. It violates get_user()
contracts.
Explicitly take pointer to the first element of the array. It matches
current behaviour.
This is preparation for fixing sparse warnings caused by Linear Address
Masking patchset.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
index 2d20da55fb64..fdd47565a311 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static int sg_scsi_ioctl(struct request_queue *q, fmode_t mode,
return -EFAULT;
if (in_len > PAGE_SIZE || out_len > PAGE_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
- if (get_user(opcode, sic->data))
+ if (get_user(opcode, &sic->data[0]))
return -EFAULT;
bytes = max(in_len, out_len);
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists