linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: Drop support for legacy PWM probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y3YJaYx06Jzrs/Ej@maple.lan>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 10:14:01 +0000
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: Drop support for legacy PWM probing

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 08:21:51AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> There is no in-tree user left which relies on legacy probing. So drop
> support for it which removes another user of the deprecated
> pwm_request() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

I have to take the "no in-tree user" on faith since I'm not familiar
enough with PWM history to check that. However from a backlight
point-of-view it looks like a nice tidy up:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>


Daniel.