linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH printk v5 38/40] tty: serial: kgdboc: use console_list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87mt8pon3a.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 12:14:09 +0106
From:   John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v5 38/40] tty: serial: kgdboc: use
 console_list_lock to trap exit

On 2022-11-16, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>>         /*
>> -        * Hold the console_lock to guarantee that no consoles are
>> +        * Hold the console_list_lock to guarantee that no consoles are
>>          * unregistered until the kgdboc_earlycon setup is complete.
>>          * Trapping the exit() callback relies on exit() not being
>>          * called until the trap is setup. This also allows safe
>>          * traversal of the console list and race-free reading of @flags.
>>          */
>> -       console_lock();
>> +       console_list_lock();
>>         for_each_console(con) {
>>                 if (con->write && con->read &&
>>                     (con->flags & (CON_BOOT | CON_ENABLED)) &&
>
> Officially don't we need both the list lock and normal lock here since
> we're reaching into the consoles?

AFAICT the only synchronization we need here is iterating the console
list, reading con->flags of a registered console, and modifying
con->exit of a registered console. The console_list_lock provides
synchronization for all of these things. By the end of this series the
console_lock does not provide synchronization for any of these things.

Is there something else that requires synchronization here?

After this series the console_lock is still responsible for:

- serializing console->write() callbacks
- stopping console->write() callbacks
- stopping console->device() callbacks
- synchronizing console->seq
- synchronizing console->dropped
- synchronizing the global @console_suspended
- providing various unclear protection for vt consoles
- some bizarre misuses in bcache

The scope may be larger than the above list. The investigation is still
ongoing.

John