[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221117134520.GD422408@chaop.bj.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 21:45:20 +0800
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ddutile@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>, tabba@...gle.com,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, mhocko@...e.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, wei.w.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 04:56:12PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >>
> >> Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > This new KVM exit allows userspace to handle memory-related errors. It
> >> > indicates an error happens in KVM at guest memory range [gpa, gpa+size).
> >> > The flags includes additional information for userspace to handle the
> >> > error. Currently bit 0 is defined as 'private memory' where '1'
> >> > indicates error happens due to private memory access and '0' indicates
> >> > error happens due to shared memory access.
> >> >
> >> > When private memory is enabled, this new exit will be used for KVM to
> >> > exit to userspace for shared <-> private memory conversion in memory
> >> > encryption usage. In such usage, typically there are two kind of memory
> >> > conversions:
> >> > - explicit conversion: happens when guest explicitly calls into KVM
> >> > to map a range (as private or shared), KVM then exits to userspace
> >> > to perform the map/unmap operations.
> >> > - implicit conversion: happens in KVM page fault handler where KVM
> >> > exits to userspace for an implicit conversion when the page is in a
> >> > different state than requested (private or shared).
> >> >
> >> > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> >> > Co-developed-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 9 +++++++++
> >> > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> >> > index f3fa75649a78..975688912b8c 100644
> >> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> >> > @@ -6537,6 +6537,29 @@ array field represents return values. The userspace should update the return
> >> > values of SBI call before resuming the VCPU. For more details on RISC-V SBI
> >> > spec refer, https://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc.
> >> >
> >> > +::
> >> > +
> >> > + /* KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT */
> >> > + struct {
> >> > + #define KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE (1 << 0)
> >> > + __u32 flags;
> >> > + __u32 padding;
> >> > + __u64 gpa;
> >> > + __u64 size;
> >> > + } memory;
> >> > +
> >> > +If exit reason is KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT then it indicates that the VCPU has
> >> > +encountered a memory error which is not handled by KVM kernel module and
> >> > +userspace may choose to handle it. The 'flags' field indicates the memory
> >> > +properties of the exit.
> >> > +
> >> > + - KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE - indicates the memory error is caused by
> >> > + private memory access when the bit is set. Otherwise the memory error is
> >> > + caused by shared memory access when the bit is clear.
> >>
> >> What does a shared memory access failure entail?
> >
> > In the context of confidential computing usages, guest can issue a
> > shared memory access while the memory is actually private from the host
> > point of view. This exit with bit 0 cleared gives userspace a chance to
> > convert the private memory to shared memory on host.
>
> I think this should be explicit rather than implied by the absence of
> another flag. Sean suggested you might want flags for RWX failures so
> maybe something like:
>
> KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_SHARED_FLAG_READ (1 << 0)
> KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_SHARED_FLAG_WRITE (1 << 1)
> KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_SHARED_FLAG_EXECUTE (1 << 2)
> KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE (1 << 3)
Yes, but I would not add 'SHARED' to RWX, they are not share memory
specific, private memory can also set them once introduced.
Thanks,
Chao
>
> which would allow you to signal the various failure modes of the shared
> region, or that you had accessed private memory.
>
> >
> >>
> >> If you envision any other failure modes it might be worth making it
> >> explicit with additional flags.
> >
> > Sean mentioned some more usages[1][]2] other than the memory conversion
> > for confidential usage. But I would leave those flags being added in the
> > future after those usages being well discussed.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200617230052.GB27751@linux.intel.com
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YKxJLcg%2FWomPE422@google.com
> >
> >> I also wonder if a bitmask makes sense if
> >> there can only be one reason for a failure? Maybe all that is needed is
> >> a reason enum?
> >
> > Tough we only have one reason right now but we still want to leave room
> > for future extension. Enum can express a single value at once well but
> > bitmask makes it possible to express multiple orthogonal flags.
>
> I agree if multiple orthogonal failures can occur at once a bitmask is
> the right choice.
>
> >
> > Chao
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > +'gpa' and 'size' indicate the memory range the error occurs at. The userspace
> >> > +may handle the error and return to KVM to retry the previous memory access.
> >> > +
> >> > ::
> >> >
> >> > /* KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY */
> >> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> >> > index f1ae45c10c94..fa60b032a405 100644
> >> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> >> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> >> > @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_exit {
> >> > #define KVM_EXIT_RISCV_SBI 35
> >> > #define KVM_EXIT_RISCV_CSR 36
> >> > #define KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY 37
> >> > +#define KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT 38
> >> >
> >> > /* For KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR */
> >> > /* Emulate instruction failed. */
> >> > @@ -538,6 +539,14 @@ struct kvm_run {
> >> > #define KVM_NOTIFY_CONTEXT_INVALID (1 << 0)
> >> > __u32 flags;
> >> > } notify;
> >> > + /* KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT */
> >> > + struct {
> >> > +#define KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE (1 << 0)
> >> > + __u32 flags;
> >> > + __u32 padding;
> >> > + __u64 gpa;
> >> > + __u64 size;
> >> > + } memory;
> >> > /* Fix the size of the union. */
> >> > char padding[256];
> >> > };
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alex Bennée
>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée
Powered by blists - more mailing lists