linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: core: Refactor pwmchip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:54:16 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: core: Refactor pwmchip_add() to avoid extra
 checks

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:22:56AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 09:24:12PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 07:00:04PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > When we already know that everything is fine there is no need
> > > to use ret variable. Refactor code accordingly.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > The patch is correct (i.e. doesn't change the semantic of the function).
> > 
> > But I think there is some more potential to clean up than it used here.
> > I will send out a series that I like better than this patch.
> 
> Fine, can you attach the second patch of this series to yours v2, please?

These are independant cleanups. I suggest that Thierry just picks up the
other patch in this series (assuming of course he is OK with it).

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)