[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202211180848.D39006C@keescook>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:49:24 -0800
From: coverity-bot <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@...el.com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Coverity: intel_hti_uses_phy(): Integer handling issues
Hello!
This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by
Coverity from a scan of next-20221118 as part of the linux-next scan project:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan
You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified
lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:
Thu Nov 17 16:12:56 2022 +0200
62749912540b ("drm/i915/display: move hti under display sub-struct")
Coverity reported the following:
*** CID 1527374: Integer handling issues (BAD_SHIFT)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hti.c:24 in intel_hti_uses_phy()
18 if (INTEL_INFO(i915)->display.has_hti)
19 i915->display.hti.state = intel_de_read(i915, HDPORT_STATE);
20 }
21
22 bool intel_hti_uses_phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum phy phy)
23 {
vvv CID 1527374: Integer handling issues (BAD_SHIFT)
vvv In expression "1UL << 2 * phy + 1", shifting by a negative amount has undefined behavior. The shift amount, "2 * phy + 1", is as little as -1.
24 return i915->display.hti.state & HDPORT_ENABLED &&
25 i915->display.hti.state & HDPORT_DDI_USED(phy);
26 }
27
28 u32 intel_hti_dpll_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
29 {
If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as
such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make
sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please
include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):
Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@...omium.org>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527374 ("Integer handling issues")
Fixes: 62749912540b ("drm/i915/display: move hti under display sub-struct")
This code appears to be safe currently (intel_hti_uses_phy() is never
called with PHY_NONE), but perhaps add an explicit check?
if (WARN_ON(phy == PHY_NONE))
return false;
Thanks for your attention!
--
Coverity-bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists