[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2259963.ElGaqSPkdT@g550jk>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:10:17 +0100
From: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
afd@...com, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: use double compatibles
Hi Jonathan,
On Sonntag, 6. November 2022 13:13:10 CET Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 11:31:36 -0500
>
> Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 07:24:54PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > > As in other bindings, let's use specific compatibles together with the
> > > fallback compatible. Adjust the bindings for it.
> >
> > You should state users are already doing this.
>
> I can fix that up whilst applying. However it raises the question:
> Should I treat this as a fix, or a tidy up (that can wait for next merge
> window)?
>
> I'm also fine with this going with the other patch in the series (that lore
> found for me as it didn't go to linux-iio) if that makes more sense.
>
Sorry for the delay in answering.
The dts patch (2/2) has already been picked up through qcom tree, so I think
you can apply this one to your tree.
It's definitely not urgent, so next merge window would be perfect.
Regards
Luca
> If that happens
>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
>
> Jonathan
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > * New patch
> > >
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml | 7 +++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists