[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221118021107.3uhixtck6sawluoy@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 02:11:19 +0000
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
To: Ferry Toth <ftoth@...londelft.nl>
CC: "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: dwc3: core: defer probe on ulpi_read_id
timeout
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022, Ferry Toth wrote:
> Since commit 0f010171
I don't your update as noted in the v3 change (ie. Greg's suggestions).
> Dual Role support on Intel Merrifield platform broke due to rearranging
> the call to dwc3_get_extcon().
>
> It appears to be caused by ulpi_read_id() masking the timeout on the first
> test write. In the past dwc3 probe continued by calling dwc3_core_soft_reset()
> followed by dwc3_get_extcon() which happend to return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> On deferred probe ulpi_read_id() finally succeeded.
>
> As we now changed ulpi_read_id() to return -ETIMEDOUT in this case, we
> need to handle the error by calling dwc3_core_soft_reset() and request
> -EPROBE_DEFER. On deferred probe ulpi_read_id() is retried and succeeds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ferry Toth <ftoth@...londelft.nl>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index 648f1c570021..2779f17bffaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -1106,8 +1106,13 @@ static int dwc3_core_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>
> if (!dwc->ulpi_ready) {
> ret = dwc3_core_ulpi_init(dwc);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> + dwc3_core_soft_reset(dwc);
I'm not sure if you saw my previous response. I wanted to check to see
if we need to do soft-reset once before ulpi init as part of its
initialization.
I'm just curious why Andrey Smirnov test doesn't require this change. If
it's a quirk for this specific configuration, then the change here is
fine. If it's required for all ULPI setup, then we can unconditionally
do that for all ULPI setup during initialization.
> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + }
> goto err0;
> + }
> dwc->ulpi_ready = true;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.2
>
Thanks,
Thinh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists