lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+vNU2pAQh6KKiX5x7hFuVpN68NZjhnzwFLRAzS9YZ8bWm1KA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:57:00 -0800
From:   Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add dt configuration for dp83867 led modes

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 5:11 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > Andrew,
> >
> > I completely agree with you but I haven't seen how that can be done
> > yet. What support exists for a PHY driver to expose their LED
> > configuration to be used that way? Can you point me to an example?
>
> Nobody has actually worked on this long enough to get code merged. e.g.
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201004095852.GB1104@bug/T/
> https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/3396223
>
> This is probably the last attempt, which was not too far away from getting merged:
> https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-leds/cover/20220503151633.18760-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com/
>
> I seem to NACK a patch like yours every couple of months. If all that
> wasted time was actually spent on a common framework, this would of
> been solved years ago.
>
> How important is it to you to control these LEDs? Enough to finish
> this code and get it merged?
>

Andrew,

Thanks for the links - the most recent attempt does look promising.
For whatever reason I don't have that series in my mail history so
it's not clear how I can respond to it.

Ansuel, are you planning on posting a v7 of 'Adds support for PHY LEDs
with offload triggers' [1]?

I'm not all that familiar with netdev led triggers. Is there a way to
configure the default offload blink mode via dt with your series? I
didn't quite follow how the offload function/blink-mode gets set.

Best Regards,

Tim
[1] https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-leds/list/?submitter=10040

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ