[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3bQn3o1A4KFp7qV@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:23:59 +0000
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, paulmck@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu/dev 1/3] net: Use call_rcu_flush() for qdisc_free_cb
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:44:12PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:16 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> >
> > In a networking test on ChromeOS, we find that using the new CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> > causes a networking test to fail in the teardown phase.
> >
> > The failure happens during: ip netns del <name>
> >
> > Using ftrace, I found the callbacks it was queuing which this series fixes. Use
> > call_rcu_flush() to revert to the old behavior. With that, the test passes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> > ---
> > net/sched/sch_generic.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > index a9aadc4e6858..63fbf640d3b2 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > @@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ static void qdisc_destroy(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
> >
> > trace_qdisc_destroy(qdisc);
> >
> > - call_rcu(&qdisc->rcu, qdisc_free_cb);
> > + call_rcu_flush(&qdisc->rcu, qdisc_free_cb);
> > }
>
> I took a look at this one.
>
> qdisc_free_cb() is essentially freeing : Some per-cpu memory, and the
> 'struct Qdisc'
>
> I do not see why we need to force a flush for this (small ?) piece of memory.
Indeed! Just tested and dropping this one still makes the test pass.
I believe this patch was papering over the issues fixed by the other
patches, so it stuck.
I will drop this one and move over to trying your suggestions for 2/3.
Thanks for taking a look,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists