[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221117194711.607b27f7@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:47:11 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Denis Arefev <arefev@...mel.ru>
Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-patchest@...uxtesting.org, trufanov@...mel.ru, vfh@...mel.ru,
Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lag_conf: Added pointer check and continue
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:39:54 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> 1. I think the patch prefix should be 'nfp: flower:'
> i.e., the patch subject should be more like
> [PATCH v2] nfp: flower: handle allocation failure in LAG delayed work
One more note here, please add the tree name to the prefix:
[PATCH net v2] ...
and a fixes tag right above the sign-off:
Fixes: bb9a8d031140 ("nfp: flower: monitor and offload LAG groups")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists