lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3cYd6u9wT/ZTHbe@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 05:30:31 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer: fix a NULL pointer dereference in
 drop_buffers()

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:50:18PM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
> syzbot found a null-ptr-deref by KASAN:
> 
>  BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:71 [inline]
>  BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in atomic_read include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:27 [inline]
>  BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in buffer_busy fs/buffer.c:2856 [inline]
>  BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in drop_buffers+0x61/0x2f0 fs/buffer.c:2868
>  Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000060 by task syz-executor.5/24786
> 
>  CPU: 0 PID: 24786 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-09589-g55be6084c8e0 #0
>  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x1e3/0x2cb lib/dump_stack.c:106
>   print_report+0xf1/0x220 mm/kasan/report.c:436
>   kasan_report+0xfb/0x130 mm/kasan/report.c:495
>   kasan_check_range+0x2a7/0x2e0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189
>   instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:71 [inline]
>   atomic_read include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:27 [inline]
>   buffer_busy fs/buffer.c:2856 [inline]
>   drop_buffers+0x61/0x2f0 fs/buffer.c:2868
>   try_to_free_buffers+0x2b1/0x640 fs/buffer.c:2898
> [...]
> 
> We use folio_has_private() to decide whether call filemap_release_folio(),
> which may call try_to_free_buffers() then. folio_has_private() return true
> for both PG_private and PG_private_2. We should only call try_to_free_buffers()
> for case PG_private. So we should recheck PG_private in try_to_free_buffers().
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+fbdb4ec578ebdcfb9ed2@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 266cf658efcf ("FS-Cache: Recruit a page flags for cache management")

but this can only happen for a filesystem which uses both bufferheads
and PG_private_2.  afaik there aren't any of those in the tree.  so
this bug can't actually happen.

if you have your own filesystem that does, you need to submit it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ