[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221118005535.1120026-1-me@inclyc.cn>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:55:35 +0800
From: Yingchi Long <me@...lyc.cn>
To: bp@...en8.de
Cc: chang.seok.bae@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
david.laight@...lab.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, me@...lyc.cn, mingo@...hat.com,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v4] x86/fpu: use _Alignof to avoid UB in TYPE_ALIGN
From: YingChi Long <me@...lyc.cn>
Link: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2350.htm
WG14 N2350 made very clear that it is an undefined behavior having type
definitions with in "offsetof". Replace the macro "TYPE_ALIGN" to
builtin "_Alignof" to avoid undefined behavior.
I've grepped all source files to find any type definitions within
"offsetof".
offsetof\(struct .*\{ .*,
This implementation of macro "TYPE_ALIGN" seemes to be the only case of
type definitions within offsetof in the kernel codebase.
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574
A clang patch has been made that rejects any definitions within
__builtin_offsetof (usually #defined with "offsetof"), and tested
compiling the kernel using clang, there are no error if this patch
applied.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Alignment.html
Link: https://godbolt.org/z/sPs1GEhbT
ISO C11 _Alignof is subtly different from the GNU C extension
__alignof__. __alignof__ is the preferred alignment and _Alignof the
minimal alignment. For 'long long' on x86 these are 8 and 4
respectively.
The macro TYPE_ALIGN being replacing has behavior that matches _Alignof
rather than __alignof__.
Signed-off-by: YingChi Long <me@...lyc.cn>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
---
v4:
- commit message changes suggested by Borislav Petkov
v3:
- commit message changes suggested by Nick and David
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221006141442.2475978-1-me@inclyc.cn/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220927153338.4177854-1-me@inclyc.cn/
Signed-off-by: Yingchi Long <me@...lyc.cn>
---
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
index 8946f89761cc..851eb13edc01 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
@@ -133,9 +133,6 @@ static void __init fpu__init_system_generic(void)
fpu__init_system_mxcsr();
}
-/* Get alignment of the TYPE. */
-#define TYPE_ALIGN(TYPE) offsetof(struct { char x; TYPE test; }, test)
-
/*
* Enforce that 'MEMBER' is the last field of 'TYPE'.
*
@@ -143,8 +140,8 @@ static void __init fpu__init_system_generic(void)
* because that's how C aligns structs.
*/
#define CHECK_MEMBER_AT_END_OF(TYPE, MEMBER) \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(TYPE) != ALIGN(offsetofend(TYPE, MEMBER), \
- TYPE_ALIGN(TYPE)))
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(TYPE) != \
+ ALIGN(offsetofend(TYPE, MEMBER), _Alignof(TYPE)))
/*
* We append the 'struct fpu' to the task_struct:
--
2.37.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists