lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:47:31 +0000
From:   <Daniel.Machon@...rochip.com>
To:     <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <luwei32@...wei.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <Lars.Povlsen@...rochip.com>, <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: microchip: sparx5: remove useless code in
 sparx5_qos_init()

Den Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 09:14:38PM +0100 skrev Andrew Lunn:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> > sparx5_qos_init() will be expanded in later patch series, as new QoS
> > features require new initializations - so this is actually somewhat
> > intentional.
> 
> When do you expect such patches to land?

Most likely sometime in the next window.

> 
> If it going to be soon, we can keep the code as it is. If it is going
> to be a while, the bots are going to keep finding this and what to
> remove it.

I see. If bots will be bugging us regularly, then it might just be best
to let the patch through.

> 
>      Andrew

/ Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ