linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/23] dt-bindings: display: tegra: add bindings for Tegra20 VIP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221118100800.4950aec0@booty>
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:08:00 +0100
From:   Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] dt-bindings: display: tegra: add bindings for
 Tegra20 VIP

Hello Krzysztof,

thanks for the review. I'm glad my error rate on bindings is lower than
it used to be before I attended your ELCE talk! ;)

On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:12:44 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:

> On 09/11/2022 15:18, luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com wrote:
> > From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
> > 
> > VIP is the parallel video capture component within the video input
> > subsystem of Tegra20 (and other Tegra chips, apparently).  
> 
> Subject: drop second, redundant "bindings".
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> >  .../display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml     | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  7 ++
> >  2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..934dabfd2307
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: NVIDIA Tegra VIP (parallel video capture) controller
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  $nodename:
> > +    const: vip  
> 
> No need to enforce names in device schemas, especially that this does
> not look like a generic name.
> 
> > +
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - nvidia,tegra20-vip
> > +
> > +  "#address-cells":
> > +    const: 1
> > +
> > +  "#size-cells":
> > +    const: 0
> > +
> > +  channel@0:  
> 
> Missing description.

OK, I think this should do:

  description: parallel video capture interface for the VI

> > +    type: object  
> 
> Do you expect it to grow to more channels?

Not on Tegra20, it has one input only, but for other SoCs it's likely.
Definitely some (including Tegra20 itself) have multiple CSI-2 inputs,
and it's reasonable that this can apply to parallel input too.

Is this enough motivation to make room for more channels, or should I
remove it since I have no plans to introduce support for other Tegra
chips?

> > +
> > +    properties:
> > +      reg: true  
> 
> const: 0
> 
> > +
> > +      ports:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> > +
> > +        properties:
> > +          port@0:
> > +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > +            description:
> > +              Port receiving the video stream from the sensor
> > +
> > +          port@1:
> > +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > +            description:
> > +              Port sending the video stream to the VI
> > +
> > +        required:
> > +          - port@0
> > +          - port@1
> > +
> > +    additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +    required:
> > +      - reg
> > +      - ports
> > +
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - "#address-cells"
> > +  - "#size-cells"
> > +  - channel@0
> > +
> > +# see nvidia,tegra20-vi.yaml for an example  
> 
> That file does not have this compatible. At least not on next-20221109.

It's added in patch 2. It's a chicken-egg problem, should I add a third
patch that adds this line only?

ACK for all other comments you wrote.

-- 
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com