linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add mb for si

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:18:14 +0100
From:   Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@...lbox.org>
To:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Zhenneng Li <lizhenneng@...inos.cn>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Cc:     Xinhui.Pan@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add mb for si

On 11/18/22 09:01, Christian König wrote:
> Am 18.11.22 um 08:48 schrieb Zhenneng Li:
>> During reboot test on arm64 platform, it may failure on boot,
>> so add this mb in smc.
>>
>> The error message are as follows:
>> [    6.996395][ 7] [  T295] [drm:amdgpu_device_ip_late_init [amdgpu]] *ERROR*
>>                 late_init of IP block <si_dpm> failed -22
>> [    7.006919][ 7] [  T295] amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu_device_ip_late_init failed
>> [    7.014224][ 7] [  T295] amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: Fatal error during GPU init
> 
> Memory barries are not supposed to be sprinkled around like this, you need to give a detailed explanation why this is necessary.
> 
> Regards,
> Christian.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenneng Li <lizhenneng@...inos.cn>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_smc.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_smc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_smc.c
>> index 8f994ffa9cd1..c7656f22278d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_smc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_smc.c
>> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ bool amdgpu_si_is_smc_running(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>       u32 rst = RREG32_SMC(SMC_SYSCON_RESET_CNTL);
>>       u32 clk = RREG32_SMC(SMC_SYSCON_CLOCK_CNTL_0);
>>   +    mb();
>> +
>>       if (!(rst & RST_REG) && !(clk & CK_DISABLE))
>>           return true;

In particular, it makes no sense in this specific place, since it cannot directly affect the values of rst & clk.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer            |                  https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast          |         Mesa and Xwayland developer