[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e493258-b267-b8ad-0812-53f4e9c849ae@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:32:15 +0100
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, eparis@...isplace.org
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, nicolas.bouchinet@...p-os.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] security: Allow all LSMs to provide xattrs for
inode_init_security hook
On 11/17/2022 6:18 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 11/17/2022 8:05 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> hOn Thu, 2022-11-10 at 10:46 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>>> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, security_inode_init_security() supports only one LSM providing
>>> an xattr and EVM calculating the HMAC on that xattr, plus other inode
>>> metadata.
>>>
>>> Allow all LSMs to provide one or multiple xattrs, by extending the security
>>> blob reservation mechanism. Introduce the new lbs_xattr field of the
>>> lsm_blob_sizes structure, so that each LSM can specify how many xattrs it
>>> needs, and the LSM infrastructure knows how many xattr slots it should
>>> allocate.
>> Perhaps supporting per LSM multiple xattrs is a nice idea, but EVM
>> doesn't currently support it. The LSM xattrs are hard coded in
>> evm_config_default_xattrnames[], based on whether the LSM is
>> configured. Additional security xattrs may be included in the
>> security.evm calculation, by extending the list via
>> security/integrity/evm/evm_xattrs.
>
> Smack uses multiple xattrs. All file system objects have a SMACK64
> attribute, which is used for access control. A program file may have
> a SMACK64EXEC attribute, which is the label the program will run with.
> A library may have a SMACK64MMAP attribute to restrict loading. A
> directory may have a SMACK64TRANSMUTE attribute, which modifies the
> new object creation behavior.
>
> The point being that it may be more than a "nice idea" to support
> multiple xattrs. It's not a hypothetical situation.
Ok, that means that I have to change the number of xattrs reserved by
Smack in patch 3.
Thanks
Roberto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists