linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC v2 02/12] mm/hugetlb: Move swap entry handling into vma lock for fault

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:10:15 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, peterx@...hat.com,
        James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 02/12] mm/hugetlb: Move swap entry handling into vma lock for fault

In hugetlb_fault(), there used to have a special path to handle swap entry
at the entrance using huge_pte_offset().  That's unsafe because
huge_pte_offset() for a pmd sharable range can access freed pgtables if
without either the walker lock or vma lock.

Here the simplest solution for making it safe is just to move the swap
handling to be after the vma lock being held.  We may need to take the
fault mutex on either migration or hwpoison entries now (also the vma lock,
but that's really needed), however neither of them is hot path so it should
be fine.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index c3aab6d5b7aa..62ff3fc51d4e 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5824,22 +5824,6 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	int need_wait_lock = 0;
 	unsigned long haddr = address & huge_page_mask(h);
 
-	ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, haddr, huge_page_size(h));
-	if (ptep) {
-		/*
-		 * Since we hold no locks, ptep could be stale.  That is
-		 * OK as we are only making decisions based on content and
-		 * not actually modifying content here.
-		 */
-		entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
-		if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(entry))) {
-			migration_entry_wait_huge(vma, ptep);
-			return 0;
-		} else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(entry)))
-			return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE |
-				VM_FAULT_SET_HINDEX(hstate_index(h));
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Serialize hugepage allocation and instantiation, so that we don't
 	 * get spurious allocation failures if two CPUs race to instantiate
@@ -5886,8 +5870,14 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * fault, and is_hugetlb_entry_(migration|hwpoisoned) check will
 	 * properly handle it.
 	 */
-	if (!pte_present(entry))
+	if (!pte_present(entry)) {
+		if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(entry)))
+			migration_entry_wait_huge(vma, ptep);
+		else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(entry)))
+			ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE |
+			    VM_FAULT_SET_HINDEX(hstate_index(h));
 		goto out_mutex;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If we are going to COW/unshare the mapping later, we examine the
-- 
2.37.3