[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f887630-cdfe-dda9-c907-278a96b0650c@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:32:34 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Christian Löhle <CLoehle@...erstone.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
"vincent.whitchurch@...s.com" <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: block: Limit queue size for consecutive requeues
On 26/10/22 10:30, Christian Löhle wrote:
> In case mmcblk relies on requeueing to fulfill block layer requests due to
> hardware or driver restricting the max_blk_count to 1 also limit the
> hardware queue size to 1 to get consecutive accesses instead of a
> round-robin on all queued reads.
>
> See SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK for such a restriction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <cloehle@...erstone.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> index fefaa901b50f..3a20f3933502 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,8 @@ struct gendisk *mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card)
> if (host->cqe_enabled && !host->hsq_enabled)
> mq->tag_set.queue_depth =
> min_t(int, card->ext_csd.cmdq_depth, host->cqe_qdepth);
> + else if (host->max_blk_count == 1)
I suggest adding a big comment here about why this is needed.
Perhaps like the information in your cover letter email.
> + mq->tag_set.queue_depth = 1;
> else
> mq->tag_set.queue_depth = MMC_QUEUE_DEPTH;
> mq->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists