[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3d0GE7msiWGlRcd@spud>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:01:28 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] riscv: dts: starfive: Add initial StarFive JH7110
device tree
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 09:17:12AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
>
> Add initial device tree for the JH7110 RISC-V SoC by StarFive
> Technology Ltd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
> Co-developed-by: Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@...rfivetech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@...rfivetech.com>
> Co-developed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 437 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 437 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c22e8f1d2640
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 StarFive Technology Co., Ltd.
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
@Emil, I feel like I have to ask given the 2022 date, but should this
stuff be attributed to your canonical address or is this fine?
Other than that, a cursory check /looks/ fine, other than the:
> + gmac0_rgmii_rxin: gmac0_rgmii_rxin {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + /* This value must be overridden by the board */
> + clock-frequency = <0>;
> + };
If you remove the clock-frequency = <0> bit, dtb validation will force
people to set the value in jh7110-board.dts which I'd prefer to rely on
than a comment.
Glad to see you sorted out the clock/reset stuff too!
Thanks,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists