[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b818219f-ab28-5bed-e2a2-1884a6dbe061@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:15:28 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dianders@...omium.org,
mka@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document the sc7280 CRD Pro
boards
On 18/11/2022 15:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/11/2022 08:30, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> Add compatibles for the Pro SKU of the sc7280 CRD boards
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>> index 463509f0f23a..2550ab251f7b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>> @@ -613,6 +613,11 @@ properties:
>> - const: google,hoglin
>> - const: qcom,sc7280
>>
>> + - description: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. sc7280 CRD Pro platform (newest rev)
>
> Such entry is already documented. I think this is not based on recent
> kernel.
My bad, I missed this is a Pro. Why it is not part of compatible? What
is the difference between hoglin and CRD Pro?
You have plenty of space in commit msg to explain this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists