linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] serial: liteuart: add IRQ support for the RX path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26f43d54-7ee6-d05e-5c1c-4bc37f06077@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 16:30:15 +0200 (EET)
From:   Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@...il.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, kgugala@...micro.com,
        mholenko@...micro.com, joel@....id.au,
        david.abdurachmanov@...il.com, florent@...oy-digital.fr,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] serial: liteuart: add IRQ support for the RX
 path

On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:58:47PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2022, Gabriel Somlo wrote:
> > 
> > > Add support for IRQ-driven RX. Support for the TX path will be added
> > > in a separate commit.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes from v3:
> > >   - add shadow irq register to support polling mode and avoid reading
> > >     hardware mmio irq register to learn which irq flags are enabled
> > >     - this also simplifies both liteuart_interrupt() and liteuart_startup()
> > > 
> > >  drivers/tty/serial/liteuart.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/liteuart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/liteuart.c
> > > index 8a6e176be08e..fad778578986 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/liteuart.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/liteuart.c
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > >  
> > >  #include <linux/bits.h>
> > >  #include <linux/console.h>
> > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > >  #include <linux/litex.h>
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > > @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ struct liteuart_port {
> > >  	struct uart_port port;
> > >  	struct timer_list timer;
> > >  	u32 id;
> > > +	u8 irq_reg;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  #define to_liteuart_port(port)	container_of(port, struct liteuart_port, port)
> > > @@ -76,6 +78,19 @@ static void liteuart_putchar(struct uart_port *port, unsigned char ch)
> > >  	litex_write8(port->membase + OFF_RXTX, ch);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void liteuart_update_irq_reg(struct uart_port *port, bool set, u8 mask)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct liteuart_port *uart = to_liteuart_port(port);
> > > +
> > > +	if (set)
> > > +		uart->irq_reg |= mask;
> > > +	else
> > > +		uart->irq_reg &= ~mask;
> > > +
> > > +	if (port->irq)
> > > +		litex_write8(port->membase + OFF_EV_ENABLE, uart->irq_reg);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void liteuart_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port)
> > >  {
> > >  }
> > > @@ -129,13 +144,27 @@ static void liteuart_rx_chars(struct uart_port *port)
> > >  	tty_flip_buffer_push(&port->state->port);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static irqreturn_t liteuart_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct liteuart_port *uart = data;
> > > +	struct uart_port *port = &uart->port;
> > > +	u8 isr;
> > > +
> > > +	spin_lock(&port->lock);
> > > +	isr = litex_read8(port->membase + OFF_EV_PENDING) & uart->irq_reg;
> > > +	if (isr & EV_RX)
> > > +		liteuart_rx_chars(port);
> > > +	spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	return IRQ_RETVAL(isr);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void liteuart_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct liteuart_port *uart = from_timer(uart, t, timer);
> > >  	struct uart_port *port = &uart->port;
> > >  
> > > -	liteuart_rx_chars(port);
> > > -
> > > +	liteuart_interrupt(0, port);
> > >  	mod_timer(&uart->timer, jiffies + uart_poll_timeout(port));
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > @@ -161,19 +190,45 @@ static unsigned int liteuart_get_mctrl(struct uart_port *port)
> > >  static int liteuart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct liteuart_port *uart = to_liteuart_port(port);
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > +	int ret;
> > >  
> > > -	/* disable events */
> > > -	litex_write8(port->membase + OFF_EV_ENABLE, 0);
> > > +	if (port->irq) {
> > > +		ret = request_irq(port->irq, liteuart_interrupt, 0,
> > > +				  KBUILD_MODNAME, uart);
> > > +		if (ret) {
> > > +			pr_err(pr_fmt("line %d irq %d failed: using polling\n"),
> > > +				port->line, port->irq);
> > 
> > dev_err() seems more appropriate here.
> 
> Makes sense, good thing `struct uart_port` has a `dev` field :)
> I've made the change, and lined it up for the upcoming v5 of the
> series.

Also that pr_fmt() should be dropped (in case you didn't already). It was 
in my mind ealier but should have stated it explicitly.


-- 
 i.