[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221119054858.178629-1-tanghui20@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:48:58 +0800
From: Hui Tang <tanghui20@...wei.com>
To: <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yusongping@...wei.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
<conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: microchip: check for null return of devm_kzalloc()
Because of the possilble failure of devm_kzalloc(), name might be NULL and
will cause null pointer derefrence later.
Therefore, it might be better to check it and directly return -ENOMEM.
Fixes: d39fb172760e ("clk: microchip: add PolarFire SoC fabric clock support")
Signed-off-by: Hui Tang <tanghui20@...wei.com>
---
drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
index 7be028dced63..32aae880a14f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
@@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_outputs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_out_hw_
struct mpfs_ccc_out_hw_clock *out_hw = &out_hws[i];
char *name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 23, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
snprintf(name, 23, "%s_out%u", parent->name, i);
out_hw->divider.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_HW(name, &parent->hw, &clk_divider_ops, 0);
out_hw->divider.reg = data->pll_base[i / MPFS_CCC_OUTPUTS_PER_PLL] +
@@ -200,6 +203,9 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_plls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clo
struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clock *pll_hw = &pll_hws[i];
char *name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 18, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
pll_hw->base = data->pll_base[i];
snprintf(name, 18, "ccc%s_pll%u", strchrnul(dev->of_node->full_name, '@'), i);
pll_hw->name = (const char *)name;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists