[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221119160818.zft3xhuwz3gm6oeg@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:08:18 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com>,
Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 054/606] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Convert to i2c's
.probe_new()
Hello Andy,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 02:03:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:36:28PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> >
> > .probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
> > that explicitly in the probe function.
>
> Since there is no split on per subsystem basis (I mean, as a series targeting
> only, let's say, IIO subsystem with cover letter), I'm answering here that all
> IIO patches are good to me, thanks, Uwe!
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks!
Does this include the three patches:
staging: iio: adt7316: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()
staging: iio: ad5933: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()
staging: iio: ade7854: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()
?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists