[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3owU0ucK2qc6GAF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 15:49:07 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com>,
Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 054/606] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Convert to i2c's
.probe_new()
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 05:08:18PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 02:03:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:36:28PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > >
> > > .probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
> > > that explicitly in the probe function.
> >
> > Since there is no split on per subsystem basis (I mean, as a series targeting
> > only, let's say, IIO subsystem with cover letter), I'm answering here that all
> > IIO patches are good to me, thanks, Uwe!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Does this include the three patches:
>
> staging: iio: adt7316: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()
> staging: iio: ad5933: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()
> staging: iio: ade7854: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()
>
> ?
It includes IIO patches, for staging I didn't looked at.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists