linux-kernel - [for-linus][PATCH 5/7] kprobes: Skip clearing aggrprobes post

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221120201222.492058544@goodmis.org>
Date:   Sun, 20 Nov 2022 15:12:01 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@...wei.com>,
        Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 5/7] kprobes: Skip clearing aggrprobes post_handler in kprobe-on-ftrace
 case

From: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>

In __unregister_kprobe_top(), if the currently unregistered probe has
post_handler but other child probes of the aggrprobe do not have
post_handler, the post_handler of the aggrprobe is cleared. If this is
a ftrace-based probe, there is a problem. In later calls to
disarm_kprobe(), we will use kprobe_ftrace_ops because post_handler is
NULL. But we're armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops. This triggers a WARN in
__disarm_kprobe_ftrace() and may even cause use-after-free:

  Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at kernel_clone+0x0/0x3c0 (error -2)
  WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 137 at kernel/kprobes.c:1135 __disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.21+0xcf/0xe0
  Modules linked in: testKprobe_007(-)
  CPU: 5 PID: 137 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-dirty #18
  [...]
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __disable_kprobe+0xcd/0xe0
   __unregister_kprobe_top+0x12/0x150
   ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
   unregister_kprobes.part.23+0x31/0xa0
   unregister_kprobe+0x32/0x40
   __x64_sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x260
   ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2cd/0x6b0
   do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
   [...]

For the kprobe-on-ftrace case, we keep the post_handler setting to
identify this aggrprobe armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops. This way we
can disarm it correctly.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221112070000.35299-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com/

Fixes: 0bc11ed5ab60 ("kprobes: Allow kprobes coexist with livepatch")
Reported-by: Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@...wei.com>
Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index cd9f5a66a690..3050631e528d 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1766,7 +1766,13 @@ static int __unregister_kprobe_top(struct kprobe *p)
 				if ((list_p != p) && (list_p->post_handler))
 					goto noclean;
 			}
-			ap->post_handler = NULL;
+			/*
+			 * For the kprobe-on-ftrace case, we keep the
+			 * post_handler setting to identify this aggrprobe
+			 * armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops.
+			 */
+			if (!kprobe_ftrace(ap))
+				ap->post_handler = NULL;
 		}
 noclean:
 		/*
-- 
2.35.1