[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3ufVKT0+gjNR7VV@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:55:00 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@...a.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, markowsky@...gle.com,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] BPF tracing for arm64 using fprobe
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:45:48AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> And speak for yourself! Just because you want it in production, does not
> mean that everyone else is forced to do so too.
Yes, I don't want it enabled in my enterprise kernels either because I
don't want bug reports for stuff which people should clearly not do in
production.
It is as simple as that.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists