linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: scm: Add QDU1000/QRU1000 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f63c7df-f220-ad80-1ec8-a5d13e866be8@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:17:08 -0600
From:   Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>,
        Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>
CC:     "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: scm: Add QDU1000/QRU1000
 compatible



On 11/20/2022 4:45 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/11/2022 19:26, Melody Olvera wrote:
>> Add compatible for scm driver for QDU1000 and QRU1000 platforms. These drivers
>> only require the compatible field, so update the bindings accordingly for
>> these platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> This patch is separated out from [1] and includes
>> changes addressing comments from that patch set.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221026190549.4005703-2-quic_molvera@quicinc.com/
> Then this is a v4. Please always include the changelog.

Apologies.

>
> Did you implement the changes requested? If they are no changes, then
> review would stay the same as before.

Yes the changes requested are implemented; this document is different from the
one originally submitted.

Thanks,
Melody
>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml        | 11 +++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml
>> index 25688571ee7c..71012d43a32f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ properties:
>>            - qcom,scm-msm8994
>>            - qcom,scm-msm8996
>>            - qcom,scm-msm8998
>> +          - qcom,scm-qdu1000
>>            - qcom,scm-sc7180
>>            - qcom,scm-sc7280
>>            - qcom,scm-sc8280xp
>> @@ -82,6 +83,16 @@ properties:
>>      description: TCSR hardware block
>>  
>>  allOf:
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            const: qcom,scm-qdu1000
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        clocks: false
>> +        clock-names: false
>> +
>>    - if:
>>        properties:
>>          compatible:
>>
>> base-commit: 147307c69ba4441ee90c1f8ce8edf5df4ea60f67
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>