linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document the sc7280 CRD Pro boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:08:33 +0530
From:   Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
        <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document the sc7280 CRD Pro
 boards



On 11/18/2022 7:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/11/2022 15:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/11/2022 08:30, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> Add compatibles for the Pro SKU of the sc7280 CRD boards
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 5 +++++
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> index 463509f0f23a..2550ab251f7b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> @@ -613,6 +613,11 @@ properties:
>>>             - const: google,hoglin
>>>             - const: qcom,sc7280
>>>   
>>> +      - description: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. sc7280 CRD Pro platform (newest rev)
>>
>> Such entry is already documented. I think this is not based on recent
>> kernel.
> 
> My bad, I missed this is a Pro. Why it is not part of compatible? What
> is the difference between hoglin and CRD Pro?
> 
> You have plenty of space in commit msg to explain this.

Sent a v2 adding the details on the difference captured in the commit log.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>