linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lockdown: kexec_file: prevent unsigned kernel image when KEXEC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d98172d77a8a0f1e3daab44ad51bf38978cc053.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:23:57 -0500
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdown: kexec_file: prevent unsigned kernel image
 when KEXEC_SIG not enabled

Hi Coiby,

On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 15:29 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> A kernel builder may not enable KEXEC_SIG and some architectures like
> ppc64 simply don't have KEXEC_SIG. In these cases, unless both
> IMA_ARCH_POLICY and secure boot also enabled, lockdown doesn't prevent
> unsigned kernel image from being kexec'ed via the kexec_file_load
> syscall whereas it could prevent one via the kexec_load syscall. Mandate
> signature verification for those cases.
> 
> Fixes: 155bdd30af17 ("kexec_file: Restrict at runtime if the kernel is locked down")
> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
> Cc: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>

Other than correcting the function name to mandate_signature_verificati
on(),

Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>