[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221121184435.btehz6dzliz3lizk@scuba>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:44:35 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Georgi Vlaev <g-vlaev@...com>
CC: Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] firmware: ti_sci: Allocate memory for the LPM
modes
On 20:13-20221116, Georgi Vlaev wrote:
[...]
> +static int ti_sci_init_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct ti_sci_info *info)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> + info->ctx_mem_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(info->dev, LPM_CTX_MEM_SIZE,
> + &info->ctx_mem_addr,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info->ctx_mem_buf) {
> + dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to allocate LPM context memory\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Attempt to call prepare_sleep, this will be NAK'd if suspend is not
> + * supported by firmware in use, in which case we will not attempt to
> + * init suspend.
> + */
> + ret = ti_sci_cmd_prepare_sleep(&info->handle, 0,
> + (u32)(info->ctx_mem_addr & 0xffffffff),
> + (u32)((u64)info->ctx_mem_addr >> 32), 0);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + return 0;
> +err:
> + dma_free_coherent(info->dev, LPM_CTX_MEM_SIZE,
> + info->ctx_mem_buf,
> + info->ctx_mem_addr);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* Description for K2G */
> static const struct ti_sci_desc ti_sci_pmmc_k2g_desc = {
> .default_host_id = 2,
> @@ -3639,6 +3682,14 @@ static int ti_sci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> + ret = ti_sci_init_suspend(pdev, info);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(dev,
> + "ti_sci_init_suspend failed, mem suspend will be non-functional.\n");
> +
> + /* Suspend is an optional feature, reset return value and continue. */
> + ret = 0;
We end up getting this warning on all platforms with TISCI - even if
LPM sequence is capable or not - what does the message mean? firmware is
not capable of supporting sleep or it is a firmware capable of
supporting, but failed to allocate LPM context memory?
If it is optional (since it is probing to see if it has functionality),
then do we need a dev_warn - maybe a softer of form?
[...]
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists