[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSTLnEX58gGFCEDHo8K3CBkU33b2oqVKUvDhRyz33ibmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:47:18 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 10:20 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in:
>
> security/commoncap.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 8cf0a1bc1287 ("capabilities: fix potential memleak on error path from vfs_getxattr_alloc()")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> f6fbd8cbf3ed ("lsm,fs: fix vfs_getxattr_alloc() return type and caller error paths")
>
> from the security tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the latter) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
That's more or less what I've done with my builds, thanks Stephen.
I asked this on a previous conflict but never received an answer so
I'll ask it one more time: is there a recommended way to notify
linux-next of an upcoming conflict? I generally notice the merge
conflict within a few minutes of merging the patches into a -next
branch, and fix it shortly afterwards. I'm happy to provide a
heads-up, and a merge example, but I'm not sure what the process is
for that, if any. Or, would you simply prefer to notice it yourself?
I'm not bothered either way, I just thought you might appreciate the
heads-up.
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists