[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3sIAHqd8Kd/XBB/@pyrite.rasen.tech>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:09:20 +0900
From: Paul Elder <paul.elder@...asonboard.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna@...tmail.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] dt-bindings: media: rkisp1: Add i.MX8MP ISP
example
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:36:31AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/11/2022 07:55, Paul Elder wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:06:14PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 18/11/2022 10:39, Paul Elder wrote:
> >>> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> >>>
> >>> Add an example to the rockchip-isp1 DT binding that showcases usage of
> >>> the parallel input of the ISP, connected to the CSI-2 receiver internal
> >>> to the i.MX8MP.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> >>
> >> Missing SoB.
> >
> > I don't quite understand. I see an SoB right there.
>
> Laurent did not sent it. Did you run checkpatch before sending?
That's why he's on the "From:" in the beginning. checkpatch says it's
fine.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't know what do you demonstrate there... usage of endpoints? That's
> >> the only difference. Such usage is the same everywhere, nothing specific
> >
> > I guess...? Doesn't the same argument apply against the px30 example too
> > then?
> >
> >> to this example. You already have two examples, so I don't think this
> >> brings anything more.
> >
> > We do have usage of this in imx8mp.dtsi and overlays for the ISP, but
> > those patches haven't been sent/merged yet, so in the meantime I think
> > there is value in providing an example here for the imx8mp.
>
> The examples are not for demonstrating imx8mp or any other soc, but this
> one given binding. Changing compatibles and few properties is not a
> different example - from "exampleness" point of view it is very similar.
Ah okay, I see.
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists