[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQcxSJHM-mM--EFY9tJKDr-8x-B2__QV10vw7t1ShqQWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:09:09 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:56 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:47:18 -0500 Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> >
> > I asked this on a previous conflict but never received an answer so
> > I'll ask it one more time: is there a recommended way to notify
> > linux-next of an upcoming conflict? I generally notice the merge
> > conflict within a few minutes of merging the patches into a -next
> > branch, and fix it shortly afterwards. I'm happy to provide a
> > heads-up, and a merge example, but I'm not sure what the process is
> > for that, if any. Or, would you simply prefer to notice it yourself?
> > I'm not bothered either way, I just thought you might appreciate the
> > heads-up.
>
> Sorry about that. Some maintainers will just send a "heads up" email
> with a suggested resolution patch (but I don't get very many). That
> can be very helpful for complicated (or non obvious) conflicts. I
> still generally look at how to fix them myself (and report them), but
> it can save me considerable time in particularly obscure cases.
Okay, I'll make a mental note to send a FYI to the linux-next list
next time I notice a merge conflict. The real trick will be to see if
I actually manage to remember the next time I see one ;)
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists