[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221121073817.7ollj7jeixrx5og5@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:08:17 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, andersson@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OPP: Disallow "opp-hz" property without a
corresponding clk
On 21-11-22, 08:22, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:27:48PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > This removes the special code added by the commit 2083da24eb56 ("OPP:
> > Allow multiple clocks for a device"), to make it work for Qcom SoC.
> >
> > In qcom-cpufreq-hw driver, we want to skip clk configuration that
> > happens via dev_pm_opp_set_opp(), but still want the OPP core to parse
> > the "opp-hz" property so we can use the freq based OPP helpers.
> >
> > The DT for Qcom SoCs is fixed now and contain a valid clk entry, and we
> > no longer need the special handling of the same in the OPP core.
>
> Didn't this affect also sc8280xp?
I assumed Mani fixed all affected Qcom SoCs :(
> Perhaps you can hold off with applying
> this one for a bit until the needed devicetree changes are in linux-next
> for all the affected platforms.
Sure.
> (It looks like Mani's series only updated sm8450 and I guess Bjorn
> hasn't picked up that one up yet either.)
I applied that series today to my cpufreq/arm/linux-next, since it had
cpufreq updates too and these patches are rebased on top of them.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists