linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Do not copy spin lock field from user in bpf_selem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a6f8b4a4-2c37-740b-af87-c61af51eaab5@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 19:30:09 +0800
From:   Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Do not copy spin lock field from user in
 bpf_selem_alloc

On 11/16/2022 4:07 PM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> On 11/16/2022 1:27 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 5:31 AM Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> bpf_selem_alloc function is used by inode_storage, sk_storage and
>>> task_storage maps to set map value, for these map types, there may
>>> be a spin lock in the map value, so if we use memcpy to copy the whole
>>> map value from user, the spin lock field may be initialized incorrectly.
>>>
>>> Since the spin lock field is zeroed by kzalloc, call copy_map_value
>>> instead of memcpy to skip copying the spin lock field to fix it.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6ac99e8f23d4 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage")
>>
>> The tag is wrong. When local storage was introduced it was not
>> possible to use spin_locks there.
>> Pls resubmit.
>> .
> 
> No, spin_lock was introduced by d83525ca62cf ("bpf: introduce bpf_spin_lock"),
> before 6ac99e8f23d4 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage").
> 
> To confirm this, I built a kernel image on comit 6ac99e8f23d4 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage")
> and run test case posted in patch 2, a softlockup was triggered. Then I picked
> this patch and tried again, nothing failed.

Hello, am I right? Or could you please give the correct fix-tag? Thanks.