linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] arm64: dts: qcom: Add pm8010 pmic dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e0835b03-c409-ef0b-501b-176251bc1725@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:50:28 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     neil.armstrong@...aro.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] arm64: dts: qcom: Add pm8010 pmic dtsi

On 21/11/2022 14:29, neil.armstrong@...aro.org wrote:
>>>> Any reason why this is licensed BSD-3 clause? It's not a recommended
>>>> license (2 clause is). Same for other patches.
>>>
>>> Probably a bad copy-paste from other existing files.
>>>
>>> While checking, the majority of arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm*.dtsi uses BSD-3-Clause
>>> so it seems this was done for quite a while now.
>>
>> If it is derivative work (of upstrea, downstream), then you might have
>> to keep BSD-3. But if not, how about changing it to BSD-2?
> 
> It's definitely a derivative work from upstream pm*.dtsi files with BSD-3-Clause
> licence.

OK.

Best regards,
Krzysztof