[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f1a4fb-42b2-580d-3736-e0e1d0cfe7fb@wolfvision.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:10:26 +0100
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next-v2 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support of
interrupt to ethernet node on Rock 3A SBC
Hi Anand,
On 11/16/22 21:01, Anand Moon wrote:
> As per the shematic gmac1 support gpio interrupt controller
Typo "shematic" -> "schematic"
> GMAC1_INT/PMEB_GPIO3_A7 add the support for this.
Maybe split the commit message into two proper sentences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: new patch added
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-rock-3a.dts | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-rock-3a.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-rock-3a.dts
> index 5378254c57ca..9f84a23a8789 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-rock-3a.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-rock-3a.dts
> @@ -588,10 +588,14 @@ rgmii_phy1: ethernet-phy@0 {
> compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
> reg = <0x0>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> - pinctrl-0 = <ð_phy_rst>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <ð_phy_rst>, <ð_phy_int>;
> reset-assert-us = <20000>;
> reset-deassert-us = <100000>;
> reset-gpios = <&gpio3 RK_PB0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio3>;
> + /* GMAC1_INT/PMEB_GPIO3_A7 */
This comment is pretty superfluous.
> + interrupts = <RK_PA7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
I am not an expert here, but I believe #interrupt-cells = <1>; means
that the phy provides an array of interrupts. Are you sure this is
correct? I find it strange that the phy driver consumes one interrupt
and provides N interrupts?!
> };
> };
>
> @@ -630,6 +634,10 @@ vcc_mipi_en: vcc_mipi_en {
> };
>
> ethernet {
> + eth_phy_int: eth-phy-int {
> + rockchip,pins = <3 RK_PA7 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
Interrupt is active low and you pull down the line here? There is a pull
up resistor on sheet 11 of the schematic, so this does not seem right at
all.
Best regards,
Michael
> + };
> +
> eth_phy_rst: eth_phy_rst {
> rockchip,pins = <3 RK_PB0 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists