lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3z0nvoyiHQZ3MnY@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:11:10 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
Cc:     b-liu@...com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: remove extra check in musb_gadget_vbus_draw

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:59:47AM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> The check for musb->xceiv->set_power duplicates the check done in
> usb_phy_set_power(). Moreover, not calling usb_phy_set_power() results in
> current USB config max current not being propagated through usb_charger FW

What does "FW" mean here?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

And is this a bugfix?  If so, what commit id does it fix?  Should it go
to stable kernels?  What hardware was this tested on that this solved a
problem for?

Please fix this and send a v2.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ