lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:35:28 -0800
From:   Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] sched: Teach arch_asym_cpu_priority() the idle state of SMT siblings

Some processors (e.g., Intel processors with ITMT) use asym_packing to
balance load between physical cores with SMT. In such case, a core with all
its SMT siblings idle is more desirable than another with one or more busy
siblings.

Other processors (e.g, Power7 with SMT8) use asym_packing to balance load
among SMT siblings of different priority, regardless of their idle state.

Add a new parameter, check_smt, that architectures can use as needed.

Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v1:
 * Introduced this patch.
---
 arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c         | 2 +-
 include/linux/sched/topology.h | 2 +-
 kernel/sched/fair.c            | 5 ++++-
 kernel/sched/sched.h           | 3 ++-
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
index 9ff480e94511..4cb5a5e4fa47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void sched_clear_itmt_support(void)
 	mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
 }
 
-int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)
+int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt)
 {
 	return per_cpu(sched_core_priority, cpu);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
index 816df6cc444e..87b64b9776f6 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline int cpu_numa_flags(void)
 }
 #endif
 
-extern int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu);
+extern int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt);
 
 struct sched_domain_attr {
 	int relax_domain_level;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d18947a9c03e..0e4251f83807 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -142,8 +142,11 @@ __setup("sched_thermal_decay_shift=", setup_sched_thermal_decay_shift);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 /*
  * For asym packing, by default the lower numbered CPU has higher priority.
+ *
+ * When doing ASYM_PACKING at the "MC" or higher domains, architectures may
+ * want to check the idle state of the SMT siblngs of @cpu.
  */
-int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)
+int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt)
 {
 	return -cpu;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 0fc7c0130755..e5e52c2e82de 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -802,7 +802,8 @@ static inline long se_weight(struct sched_entity *se)
  */
 static inline bool sched_asym_prefer(int a, int b, bool check_smt)
 {
-	return arch_asym_cpu_priority(a) > arch_asym_cpu_priority(b);
+	return arch_asym_cpu_priority(a, check_smt) >
+	       arch_asym_cpu_priority(b, check_smt);
 }
 
 struct perf_domain {
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ