[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221122203532.15013-4-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:35:28 -0800
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] sched: Teach arch_asym_cpu_priority() the idle state of SMT siblings
Some processors (e.g., Intel processors with ITMT) use asym_packing to
balance load between physical cores with SMT. In such case, a core with all
its SMT siblings idle is more desirable than another with one or more busy
siblings.
Other processors (e.g, Power7 with SMT8) use asym_packing to balance load
among SMT siblings of different priority, regardless of their idle state.
Add a new parameter, check_smt, that architectures can use as needed.
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v1:
* Introduced this patch.
---
arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c | 2 +-
include/linux/sched/topology.h | 2 +-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
index 9ff480e94511..4cb5a5e4fa47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void sched_clear_itmt_support(void)
mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
}
-int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)
+int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt)
{
return per_cpu(sched_core_priority, cpu);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
index 816df6cc444e..87b64b9776f6 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline int cpu_numa_flags(void)
}
#endif
-extern int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu);
+extern int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt);
struct sched_domain_attr {
int relax_domain_level;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d18947a9c03e..0e4251f83807 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -142,8 +142,11 @@ __setup("sched_thermal_decay_shift=", setup_sched_thermal_decay_shift);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* For asym packing, by default the lower numbered CPU has higher priority.
+ *
+ * When doing ASYM_PACKING at the "MC" or higher domains, architectures may
+ * want to check the idle state of the SMT siblngs of @cpu.
*/
-int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)
+int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt)
{
return -cpu;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 0fc7c0130755..e5e52c2e82de 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -802,7 +802,8 @@ static inline long se_weight(struct sched_entity *se)
*/
static inline bool sched_asym_prefer(int a, int b, bool check_smt)
{
- return arch_asym_cpu_priority(a) > arch_asym_cpu_priority(b);
+ return arch_asym_cpu_priority(a, check_smt) >
+ arch_asym_cpu_priority(b, check_smt);
}
struct perf_domain {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists