| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:38:45 -0800
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, weixugc@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com, fvdl@...gle.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH V1] mm: Disable demotion from proactive reclaim
Since commit 3f1509c57b1b ("Revert "mm/vmscan: never demote for memcg
reclaim""), the proactive reclaim interface memory.reclaim does both
reclaim and demotion. This is likely fine for us for latency critical
jobs where we would want to disable proactive reclaim entirely, and is
also fine for latency tolerant jobs where we would like to both
proactively reclaim and demote.
However, for some latency tiers in the middle we would like to demote but
not reclaim. This is because reclaim and demotion incur different latency
costs to the jobs in the cgroup. Demoted memory would still be addressable
by the userspace at a higher latency, but reclaimed memory would need to
incur a pagefault.
To address this, I propose having reclaim-only and demotion-only
mechanisms in the kernel. There are a couple possible
interfaces to carry this out I considered:
1. Disable demotion in the memory.reclaim interface and add a new
demotion interface (memory.demote).
2. Extend memory.reclaim with a "demote=<int>" flag to configure the demotion
behavior in the kernel like so:
- demote=0 would disable demotion from this call.
- demote=1 would allow the kernel to demote if it desires.
- demote=2 would only demote if possible but not attempt any
other form of reclaim.
I've implemented option #1 in this RFC to demonstrate a sample and would
love feedback on the usecase and approach.
Additionally, when triggering proactive demotion it is preferrable to have
a nodelist argument that allows the userspace to proactively demote from
specific memory tiers according to its policy. The userspace may want
to demote from specific nodes that are under pressure, and may want to
demote from specific tiers that are under pressure. An example of this
use case would be in a 3 memory tier system, the userspace may want to
demote from the second tier without disturbing the hot memory in the top
tier.
The current RFC series is missing updates to docs and selftests, but if
the general approach and usecase is acceptable I plan to add these with
a PATCH V1 review.
First patch in this series disables demotion from the proactive reclaim
interface memory.reclaim. Follow up patches in the series implement the
memory.demote interface and its nodeslist arg.
Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
---
include/linux/swap.h | 6 ++++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 16 +++++++++-------
mm/vmscan.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index fec6647a289a..f768171c2dc2 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -416,6 +416,12 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP (1 << 1)
#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE (1 << 2)
+#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_DEMOTE (1 << 3)
+#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_ONLY_DEMOTE (1 << 4)
+#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT \
+ (MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP | MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_DEMOTE)
+#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_SWAP (MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT & ~MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP)
+
extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unsigned long nr_pages,
gfp_t gfp_mask,
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f412c903ee4f..fd4ff1c865a2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ static unsigned long reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
nr_reclaimed += try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages,
gfp_mask,
- MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP);
+ MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT);
psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&
!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg));
@@ -2637,7 +2637,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
struct page_counter *counter;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
bool passed_oom = false;
- unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
+ unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT;
bool drained = false;
bool raised_max_event = false;
unsigned long pflags;
@@ -3503,7 +3503,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
}
if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
- memsw ? 0 : MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP)) {
+ memsw ? MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_SWAP :
+ MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT)) {
ret = -EBUSY;
break;
}
@@ -3614,7 +3615,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return -EINTR;
if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
- MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP))
+ MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT))
nr_retries--;
}
@@ -6407,7 +6408,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
}
reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - high,
- GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP);
+ GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT);
if (!reclaimed && !nr_retries--)
break;
@@ -6456,7 +6457,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
if (nr_reclaims) {
if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - max,
- GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP))
+ GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT))
nr_reclaims--;
continue;
}
@@ -6593,7 +6594,8 @@ static ssize_t memory_reclaim(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
if (err)
return err;
- reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP | MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE;
+ reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_DEFAULT | MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE;
+ reclaim_options &= ~MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_DEMOTE;
while (nr_reclaimed < nr_to_reclaim) {
unsigned long reclaimed;
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index d8751e403599..dea05ad8ece5 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -132,8 +132,14 @@ struct scan_control {
/* The file folios on the current node are dangerously low */
unsigned int file_is_tiny:1;
- /* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
- unsigned int no_demotion:1;
+ /*
+ * Configure discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory:
+ *
+ * demotion = 0 -> no demotion
+ * demotion = 1 -> may demote
+ * demotion = 2 -> only demote
+ */
+ unsigned int demotion;
#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN
/* help kswapd make better choices among multiple memcgs */
@@ -542,7 +548,7 @@ static bool can_demote(int nid, struct scan_control *sc)
{
if (!numa_demotion_enabled)
return false;
- if (sc && sc->no_demotion)
+ if (sc && !sc->demotion)
return false;
if (next_demotion_node(nid) == NUMA_NO_NODE)
return false;
@@ -2674,7 +2680,7 @@ static unsigned int reclaim_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
.may_writepage = 1,
.may_unmap = 1,
.may_swap = 1,
- .no_demotion = 1,
+ .demotion = 0,
};
nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(folio_list, pgdat, &sc, &dummy_stat, false);
@@ -6726,6 +6732,13 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
*/
struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), sc.gfp_mask);
+ if (reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_ONLY_DEMOTE)
+ sc.demotion = 2;
+ else if (reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_DEMOTE)
+ sc.demotion = 1;
+ else
+ sc.demotion = 0;
+
set_task_reclaim_state(current, &sc.reclaim_state);
trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin(0, sc.gfp_mask);
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
--
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists