linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] FUSE BPF: A Stacked Filesystem Extension for FUSE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2dc5e840-0ce8-dae9-99b9-e33d6ccbb016@fastmail.fm>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 22:23:35 +0100
From:   Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
To:     Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] FUSE BPF: A Stacked Filesystem Extension for
 FUSE



On 11/22/22 21:56, Daniel Rosenberg wrote:
> I've been running the generic xfstests against it, with some
> modifications to do things like mount/unmount the lower and upper fs
> at once. Most of the failures I see there are related to missing
> opcodes, like FUSE_SETLK, FUSE_GETLK, and FUSE_IOCTL. The main failure
> I have been seeing is generic/126, which is happening due to some
> additional checks we're doing in fuse_open_backing. I figured at some
> point we'd add some tests into libfuse, and that sounds like a good
> place to start.


Here is a branch of xfstests that should work with fuse and should not 
run "rm -fr /" (we are going to give it more testing this week).

https://github.com/hbirth/xfstests


Bernd